It's all about men – What is a man? How should he live?                              Questions? Send an email to Men of Honor. 

 

A Story of a Spiritual Awakening

I spent nearly my entire adult life (since 1983) going to and becoming a member of several Southern Baptist churches.  For a while, I had no interest in theology nor the biblical history; but I did have an interest in songs, sermons, and by-laws lining up with Scripture. 

 

In June of 1994, I went through a personal awakening/reformation that left me hungry for the Word and obedience in my life (I have recently concluded this even was actually my conversion, or new birth as a Christian -leading me to submit to baptism AFTER salvation), and I began learning much and enjoying fellowship with the saints all the more.  In time, I began teaching and exhorting men to read and obey the Bible, to lead their families, to test what they read and heard in light of Scripture.

 

Not long after a career bump caused us to move to Houston, our new "home town" was swept up with Rick Warren's "40 Days of Purpose" campaign (see here, and here for examples and information on this madness).  I had no idea who this man was, at the time, but had concluded that Truth doesn't mix with the New York Times Best Seller list - that being a reflection of the values of the world, which is at enmity towards God.  At a local multi-church men's ministry meeting, a man was far too excited about The Purpose Driven Life and all things Rick Warren.  He was astounded that I hadn't read "the book" and shoved a copy into my hands.  I was grieved as I read this wretched book and recognized much of Warren's methods as those of my church.

 

This awakening - to the cancer of Robert Schuller and Charles Finney that was invading myriad churches and to my own personal lack of care in discerning truth and error - led me to read the Bible more and seek out teachers and more mature men to learn from.  I know my own personal vulnerability to being led astray, and began to test everything I read and heard and thought to see if it lined up with the Word of God.  One Sunday School teacher in my church was a solid reformed theologian and was foundational in helping me see the Truth in what is commonly called Calvinism.  Another dear brother was very learned in reformed theology and patient to explain doctrine and how to discriminate between critical and non-essential doctrines.  It dawned on me that all those SBC churches we had belonged to had taught a semi-Arminien dispensationalist theology - without ever telling us that's what they were doing.

 

I began asking my pastors about some of our teaching and methods, pointing out where I thought they were at adds with Scripture and asking to be corrected from Scripture if I was considered wrong.  Not once was I corrected from Scripture, while on more than one occasion a pastor applied a passage completely out of context in rebutting my position.  One pastor (who personally knows Rick Warren well), in defending The Purpose Driven Life, told me that it was "sloppy" because he (Warren) had been teaching this for 20 years; he recommended Warren's The Purpose Driven Church as "much more tightly written".  It was not lost on me that The Purpose Driven Life had been in print for several years and passed 23 million copies - and that the publishing industry does not tolerate sloppiness.  Nor was it lost on me that this pastor used "sloppy" and "tight" rather than "correct" and "false" or other more meaningful terms.

 

After a few months of wondering, I discovered that a friend had a copy of The Purpose Driven Church and I borrowed it to see if was "tight".  sigh.  I found less to recommend than in the "sloppy" book.

 

This led to continued testing on my part of all that my church did, resulting in several meetings with the pastors - none of which resolved a thing.  (During this time, I visited another church, having previously traded some email with a man who had moved on to start and serve as an elder in this other church.  I told my wife that I knew where we would go when it came time to leave our then-current church.  More on this, later.)  After much prayer and discussion with my wife and a few trusted men, I requested a meeting with the elder board to discuss my concern that the church was more worldly than biblical in its organization and operation.  My purpose was to try and paint a verbal picture of this, and avoid getting into a point-by-point discussion of the examples used.  And since I was "accusing and elder", I had two trusted brothers accompany me.

 

During this March 2008 meeting, there was shock and denial that the church had much - if any - worldly influence within her and there was SHOCK that I was not inviting people to visit the church until the concerns explained in the letter I would leave with them were addressed.  After a 3 hour conversation, I left each of them a copy of this letter and asked them to let me know if there was any agreement with the overall charge of worldliness in the church - and if so, what was their response; and to please let me know how they held one another accountable in their respective offices as staff functional elders.

 

After a month with no response, I sent an email to the elder board asking for answers to those two questions.  I was approached the next day by one of the pastors who asked me to meet with him and one other pastor to discuss my email.  During this short meeting, I was told they had no idea I was expecting any feedback and they also had no idea why I would involve the non-staff elders (approximately half the elders were "laymen").  These two basically told me they were satisfied with how things were going and that was that.

 

Not to be difficult, but I was not satisfied - and my wife was tired of hearing from me about this.  On 21 July, 2008 I sent a short email to the elders, asking 6 short questions.  On 28 July, I received a two page response that struck me as obtuse.  So on 16 August I asked for clarification.  None was forthcoming.  

 

So I waited, watched, and listened.  I asked my wife and those few friends to test me to see if I was in error or prideful (both have been the case, at times).  By early December, two things were apparent: a.) nothing of substance within the church was changing, and b.) my attitude toward the elders was deteriorating  - this was bad for my soul.  I concluded that I could not remain there as a member any longer, so I gave the "senior pastor" a note of resignation

 

And my wife and I began our joyful association with Grace Family Baptist Church.  While the preaching at GfBC does not always please my flesh, it consistantly nourishes my soul - and more importantly - honors and glorifies the Lord Jesus.  Never have I been in a church that is as deliberate in all that she does and the manner in which she does them - that all be for the glory of God.  And for the first time in my life, the elders remind us from time to time that they hold to reformed (Calvinist) theology - there's no need to guess where they're coming from.  And since the guiding principle is to glorify God, I joyfully submit to these elders even when I do not (yet) agree with them, not having discovered anything in which they veer from the Scriptures.  

 

God is good, His Word is True, the biblical Jesus is the Christ, and His church will endure!  

In His grip of grace,

 

Stuart L. Brogden

 

Site Designed by Indezyn, LLC E-Mail LeafFilter